It is really preferable to a small table because it is not
always full of a nondescript collection of ornaments, which seems to be
the fate of all small tables. It has also the advantage of being low
enough to push under a large table, when need be, and it occupies much
less space than a chair apparently (not actually) because it has no
back. I have stools, or benches, or both in all my rooms, because I find
them convenient and easily moved about, but I have noticed an amusing
thing: Whenever a fat man comes to see me, he always sits on the
smallest stool in the room. I have many fat friends, and many stools,
but invariably the fattest man gravitates to the smallest stool.
The stools I like best for the drawing-room are the fine old ones,
covered with needlework or brocade, but there are many simpler ones of
plain wood with cane insets that are very good for other rooms. Then
there are the long _banquettes_, or benches, which are so nice in
drawing-rooms and hallways and nicest of all in a ballroom. Indeed, a
ballroom needs no other movable furniture; given plenty of these long
benches. They may be of the very simplest description, but when used in
a fine room should be covered with a good damask or velvet or some rich
fabric.
I have a fine Eighteenth Century _banquette_ in my drawing-room, the
frame being carved and gilded and the seat covered with Venetian red
velvet.
Pages:
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234