Let him study the museum collections, visit
the private collections, consult recognized experts. If he is serious,
he will gradually acquire the intuition of knowing the genuine from the
false, the worth-while from the worthless, and once he has that
knowledge, instinct, call it what you will, he can never be satisfied
with imitations.
The collection and association of antiques and reproductions should be
determined by the collector's sense of fitness, it seems to me. Every
man should depend on whatever instinct for rightness, for suitability,
he may possess. If he finds that he dare not risk his individual
opinion, then let him be content with the things he _knows_ to be both
beautiful and useful, and leave the subtler decisions for someone else.
For instance, there are certain objects that are obviously the better
for age, the objects that are softened and refined by a bloom that comes
from usage.
An old rug has a softness that a new one cannot imitate. An old copper
kettle has an uneven quality that has come from years of use. A new
kettle may be quite as useful, but age has given the old one a certain
quality that hanging and pounding cannot reproduce. A pewter platter
that has been used for generations is dulled and softened to a glow that
a new platter cannot rival.
What charm is to a woman, the vague thing called quality is to an object
of art.
Pages:
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194