Yet there it was! The most rigid
of his kind in pursuit of virtue and in observance of the law, saw "a
fish"--and straightway, irresistibly the old Adam moved within him. Nay!
Under certain circumstances hardly would one trust even a black-coated
Border minister if a salmon provoked him too sorely.
In former days, many were the ways whereby a fish might be induced to
quit his native element. Now, it is different; though even now possibly
his end might not in every case endure too close scrutiny. But in the
days when our grandsires and great-grandsires were young, salmon were
regarded as of small value; they sold possibly at _2d._ the pound, and
servants in Tweedside homes were wont to bargain that they should not be
forced to eat salmon every day of the week. Then, practically no method
of capture was illegal; you might take him almost when, where, and how
you pleased. Indeed, one reads that at St. Boswells in 1794 the
neighbourhood was "seldom at a loss for a small salmon, which proves a
great conveniency to families." It was not as if such a thing as a close
season had never been known. Five hundred years before the date above
mentioned there were laws in existence regulating the capture of salmon,
and in the reign of James I of Scotland the law was most stringent.
Pages:
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340